I’m driven to start my first blog by the headlines about the impact of the new Legal Services Commission contract on industrial relations at Shelter. They’re not alone – the new contracts are wreaking havoc in voluntary advice agencies throughout the country. I think it’s time we fought our own corner a little harder.
Way back in 2006 we told the LSC that replacing hourly payments with fixed fees was going to be a recipe for disaster. The new fixed fee for a welfare benefit case is a princely £164 – equivalent to three hours of our casework and just twenty minutes of that of a corporate lawyer. Our average time to complete a case is six and half hours. I would say ‘you do the maths’ but the maths doesn’t add up.
The most desperate clients will inevitably suffer as hard-pressed agencies are forced to take on easier, quicker cases just in order to survive. And, as everyone involved in providing voluntary legal advice knows, there a precious few safety nets left for those clients we can’t take.
Times are hard; for government, funders, the LSC and public alike. I know that choices have to be made. I accept that ‘value for money’ is more of a mantra than ever before. So fine, let’s talk about value for money. Last year lasa’s success rate at tribunal was 85% – as opposed to a 40% success rate for clients who aren’t represented. And we know how economically devastating the fall-out from failure at tribunal can be.
I don’t think advice centres can wait until things get even worse than they are. I think we owe ourselves and, most importantly, our clients a bit better than that. It’s time to get proactive about telling the media exactly what the impact of these new contracts really is.
May 13, 2008 at 8:57 pm |
One way to make this case more powerfully would be to start collecting evidence from different advice agencies i.e. anecdotes on how this is affecting real, vulnerable people – the media love these human interest stories. Anyone got anything to share?
June 16, 2008 at 11:44 am |
I am constantly being told how I am doing, by this I mean, how much I cost the bureau. working to pay your own wages wasn’t really why I joined the CAB. The Government really do have to look at this quickly before the scheme collapses.
June 17, 2008 at 10:42 am |
Thanks for your comments Gary. I hope that my post will serve to highlight the enormous strain that the advice sector is under – and how the government is failing to put the interests of clients first.
Kind regards, Andy Gregg.